+37.1%
NCLH vs FITB
+144.0%
-106.9%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.1% | -1.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +2.8% | -2.5% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +20.8% | +9.8% | +11.0% | +11.4% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -5.2% | -3.0% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +11.8% | +17.3% | -5.5% | -3.6% |
| YTD | -19.5% | +19.3% | -38.8% | -32.5% |
| 1Y | -3.2% | +32.7% | -35.9% | -26.6% |
| 3Y | +37.1% | +141.6% | -104.5% | -40.1% |
| All | +37.1% | +144.0% | -106.9% | -40.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling