-10.9%
NCLH vs EAT
+587.9%
-598.8%
-49.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -3.2% | -0.3% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -4.6% | -6.8% | +2.2% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -19.9% | -5.4% | -14.6% | -18.5% |
| 3M | -22.0% | +42.8% | -64.7% | -34.1% |
| 6M | -28.3% | +56.5% | -84.8% | -42.5% |
| YTD | -33.5% | +50.0% | -83.5% | -45.6% |
| 1Y | -41.5% | +38.3% | -79.7% | -50.7% |
| All | -10.9% | +587.9% | -598.8% | -70.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling