+42.8%
NBIX vs ACGL
+30.5%
+12.3%
-42.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +0.1% | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -3.6% | +2.5% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -2.1% | -1.2% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -2.7% | +5.4% | -8.0% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +20.6% | 0.0% | +20.6% | +20.4% |
| YTD | +10.4% | +0.3% | +10.1% | +10.0% |
| 1Y | +10.8% | +6.2% | +4.7% | +9.2% |
| All | +42.8% | +30.5% | +12.3% | +30.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling