+1,119.4%
NBIS vs ZTS
-60.6%
+1,180.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | -3.0% | +10.7% | +7.1% |
| 7D | +22.2% | -4.8% | +27.0% | +21.0% |
| 30D | +29.7% | +1.2% | +28.5% | +30.3% |
| 3M | +11.9% | -6.0% | +17.9% | +12.3% |
| 6M | +173.0% | -38.7% | +211.7% | +183.2% |
| YTD | +191.4% | -40.6% | +232.0% | +202.7% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | -50.6% | +331.3% | +304.4% |
| All | +1,119.4% | -60.6% | +1,180.0% | +1,146.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling