+1,101.8%
NBIS vs ZBRA
-7.7%
+1,109.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZBRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.2% | +0.7% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -1.8% | +19.6% | +18.9% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -8.8% | +39.3% | +37.4% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +47.2% | -38.0% | -17.9% |
| 6M | +153.2% | +61.3% | +91.9% | +75.7% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +42.0% | +145.1% | +115.8% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +10.5% | +140.6% | +128.0% |
| All | +1,101.8% | -7.7% | +1,109.5% | +1,239.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZBRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZBRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZBRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZBRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling