+1,040.6%
NBIS vs VRSK
-33.4%
+1,073.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VRSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -1.2% | -3.9% | -5.9% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -7.7% | +16.0% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +18.1% | -2.8% | +20.9% | +17.0% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -3.7% | +11.5% | +7.2% |
| 6M | +136.6% | -12.8% | +149.3% | +131.5% |
| YTD | +172.5% | -21.0% | +193.5% | +154.7% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | -32.5% | +176.7% | +114.2% |
| All | +1,040.6% | -33.4% | +1,073.9% | +1,064.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VRSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VRSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VRSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VRSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling