+151.8%
NBIS vs UMC
+238.8%
-87.0%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +2.4% | -3.9% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +9.0% | -9.8% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -13.4% | +17.2% | -30.6% | -20.5% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +11.4% | -10.4% | -2.4% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +137.5% | -37.0% | +55.5% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +193.1% | -24.8% | +78.9% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +240.3% | -88.5% | +57.9% |
| All | +151.8% | +238.8% | -87.0% | +57.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling