+1,101.8%
NBIS vs TRGP
+85.3%
+1,016.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.0% | -0.5% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -0.7% | +18.5% | +18.2% |
| 30D | +30.5% | +9.5% | +21.1% | +23.5% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +10.8% | -1.6% | +1.3% |
| 6M | +153.2% | +25.3% | +127.8% | +114.1% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +60.3% | +126.9% | +100.2% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +84.6% | +66.5% | +50.5% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +85.3% | +1,016.5% | +955.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling