+1,022.8%
NBIS vs TPG
-22.2%
+1,045.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +1.6% | -3.2% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -9.4% | +8.6% | +5.3% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -5.3% | -8.1% | -11.6% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +12.9% | -11.9% | -8.6% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +20.1% | +80.4% | +72.5% |
| YTD | +168.3% | -22.5% | +190.8% | +214.9% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | -19.7% | +171.4% | +183.2% |
| All | +1,022.8% | -22.2% | +1,045.0% | +1,126.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling