+1,031.9%
NBIS vs SLB
+44.2%
+987.7%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | SLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +0.2% | +7.3% | +7.4% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +0.8% | +7.4% | +8.0% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +15.8% | -12.4% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -0.3% | -12.5% | -12.1% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +21.3% | +110.2% | +112.9% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +52.3% | +118.2% | +124.0% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +63.6% | +185.2% | +177.9% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +44.2% | +987.7% | +800.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling