+1,031.9%
NBIS vs PR
+76.8%
+955.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -1.6% | +9.1% | +8.2% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +2.9% | +5.3% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +18.0% | -14.7% | -5.0% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +16.9% | -29.7% | -19.9% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +28.2% | +103.3% | +100.0% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +69.3% | +101.1% | +99.4% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +69.5% | +179.3% | +154.8% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +76.8% | +955.1% | +658.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling