+1,031.9%
NBIS vs PLD
+20.7%
+1,011.3%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -0.7% | +8.2% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -2.4% | +10.6% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -2.4% | +5.8% | +3.4% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -3.8% | -9.0% | -12.7% |
| 6M | +131.5% | 0.0% | +131.5% | +128.6% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +9.2% | +161.2% | +161.6% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +25.9% | +222.9% | +222.7% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +20.7% | +1,011.3% | +808.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling