+547.5%
NBIS vs PLD
+12.4%
+535.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | -1.2% | +8.8% | +7.6% |
| 7D | -16.0% | -0.8% | -15.2% | -15.9% |
| 30D | -45.4% | -0.3% | -45.1% | -45.3% |
| 3M | -31.8% | -8.0% | -23.8% | -31.5% |
| 6M | -33.6% | -9.8% | -23.8% | -33.4% |
| YTD | +54.7% | +1.8% | +52.9% | +50.3% |
| 1Y | +18.3% | +5.6% | +12.7% | +14.0% |
| All | +547.5% | +12.4% | +535.0% | +422.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling