+1,031.9%
NBIS vs ONTO
+28.5%
+1,003.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +6.2% | +1.3% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -1.0% | +9.3% | +9.1% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -2.9% | +6.3% | +4.8% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -2.5% | -10.4% | -11.1% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +28.2% | +103.3% | +86.7% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +69.8% | +100.7% | +80.8% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +162.9% | +85.9% | +69.8% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +28.5% | +1,003.5% | +880.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling