+1,101.8%
NBIS vs ONDS
+683.0%
+418.7%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ONDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -4.3% | +2.9% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -4.2% | +22.0% | +19.0% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -21.7% | +52.2% | +38.5% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -24.5% | +33.6% | +17.2% |
| 6M | +153.2% | -25.0% | +178.2% | +167.5% |
| YTD | +187.1% | -25.3% | +212.4% | +203.1% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +33.8% | +117.3% | +135.0% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +683.0% | +418.7% | +656.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling