+673.5%
NBIS vs NIO
-36.3%
+709.8%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +15.4% | -1.2% | +16.7% | +15.9% |
| 7D | +9.3% | -1.8% | +11.1% | +10.3% |
| 30D | -26.4% | -6.6% | -19.7% | -24.1% |
| 3M | -19.9% | -29.9% | +9.9% | -9.1% |
| 6M | -16.9% | -46.6% | +29.7% | +3.8% |
| YTD | +84.8% | -36.5% | +121.3% | +114.4% |
| 1Y | +51.3% | -51.1% | +102.5% | +90.5% |
| All | +673.5% | -36.3% | +709.8% | +771.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling