+248.8%
NBIS vs NIO
-37.4%
+286.2%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -1.6% | +9.0% | +8.1% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -13.0% | +21.3% | +14.3% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -18.3% | +21.7% | +11.6% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -33.2% | +20.4% | +2.6% |
| 6M | +131.5% | -21.5% | +153.0% | +151.2% |
| YTD | +170.5% | -25.5% | +196.0% | +198.7% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | -38.0% | +286.8% | +336.8% |
| All | +248.8% | -37.4% | +286.2% | +336.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling