+1,040.6%
NBIS vs MCHP
-1.4%
+1,041.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MCHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -2.0% | -3.1% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -2.1% | +10.4% | +9.7% |
| 30D | +18.1% | -11.1% | +29.2% | +26.3% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -18.1% | +25.8% | +21.6% |
| 6M | +136.6% | +10.8% | +125.8% | +126.6% |
| YTD | +172.5% | +14.2% | +158.3% | +153.6% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | +13.5% | +130.8% | +127.4% |
| All | +1,040.6% | -1.4% | +1,041.9% | +950.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling