+1,040.6%
NBIS vs LUNR
+76.6%
+964.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LUNR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -2.1% | -3.0% | -4.3% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -0.5% | +8.8% | +8.6% |
| 30D | +18.1% | -11.3% | +29.3% | +23.6% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -44.9% | +52.7% | +30.7% |
| 6M | +136.6% | -17.3% | +153.9% | +132.0% |
| YTD | +172.5% | -9.9% | +182.4% | +153.4% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | +76.1% | +68.1% | +75.6% |
| All | +1,040.6% | +76.6% | +964.0% | +761.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LUNR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LUNR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LUNR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LUNR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling