+1,101.8%
NBIS vs LNT
+16.2%
+1,085.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.1% | -0.4% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +17.8% | +0.2% | +17.6% | +17.8% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -0.5% | +31.1% | +29.8% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -5.5% | +14.7% | +4.5% |
| 6M | +153.2% | -3.8% | +157.0% | +147.0% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +6.8% | +180.3% | +198.7% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +9.3% | +141.8% | +165.4% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +16.2% | +1,085.6% | +1,281.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling