+1,022.8%
NBIS vs LHX
+1.8%
+1,020.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LHX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.1% | -0.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -4.3% | +3.4% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -15.1% | +1.8% | -13.7% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -21.0% | +22.0% | +1.3% |
| 6M | +100.5% | -32.0% | +132.5% | +107.1% |
| YTD | +168.3% | -15.3% | +183.6% | +180.4% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | -11.1% | +162.8% | +166.7% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +1.8% | +1,020.9% | +1,012.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LHX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LHX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LHX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LHX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling