+1,119.4%
NBIS vs LH
+53.8%
+1,065.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | -0.6% | +8.3% | +7.7% |
| 7D | +22.2% | -0.8% | +23.1% | +22.2% |
| 30D | +29.7% | +2.0% | +27.7% | +29.7% |
| 3M | +11.9% | +24.3% | -12.4% | +10.8% |
| 6M | +173.0% | +21.1% | +152.0% | +172.0% |
| YTD | +191.4% | +30.4% | +160.9% | +181.4% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | +18.4% | +262.3% | +279.6% |
| All | +1,119.4% | +53.8% | +1,065.6% | +971.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling