+1,031.9%
NBIS vs LCID
-82.1%
+1,114.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +1.7% | +5.7% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -6.6% | +14.8% | +10.7% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -30.1% | +33.5% | +15.7% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -17.6% | +4.8% | -13.2% |
| 6M | +131.5% | -54.4% | +186.0% | +189.6% |
| YTD | +170.5% | -55.7% | +226.2% | +241.3% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | -71.0% | +319.8% | +418.2% |
| All | +1,031.9% | -82.1% | +1,114.1% | +1,824.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling