+447.0%
NBIS vs KRMN
+14.6%
+432.4%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -2.4% | -2.7% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -15.1% | +23.4% | +16.7% |
| 30D | +18.1% | -44.5% | +62.5% | +56.4% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -25.0% | +32.8% | +21.5% |
| 6M | +136.6% | -66.5% | +203.1% | +291.2% |
| YTD | +172.5% | -53.0% | +225.5% | +281.7% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | -44.7% | +189.0% | +215.9% |
| All | +447.0% | +14.6% | +432.4% | +368.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling