+1,031.9%
NBIS vs HUT
+551.9%
+480.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +6.2% | +1.3% | +3.9% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +17.8% | -9.6% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +0.8% | +2.5% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -26.8% | +14.0% | +3.6% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +72.6% | +59.0% | +64.8% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +103.6% | +66.8% | +74.4% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +265.3% | -16.5% | +51.4% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +551.9% | +480.1% | +282.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling