+1,022.8%
NBIS vs HUBS
-57.9%
+1,080.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +0.8% | -2.4% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -9.0% | +8.2% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -13.4% | +7.2% | -20.6% | -15.5% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +20.9% | -19.8% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +100.5% | -13.0% | +113.5% | +100.3% |
| YTD | +168.3% | -43.8% | +212.1% | +234.5% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | -54.6% | +206.4% | +255.2% |
| All | +1,022.8% | -57.9% | +1,080.6% | +1,840.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling