+1,040.6%
NBIS vs HPQ
-4.1%
+1,044.7%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HPQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | +1.0% | -6.1% | -5.4% |
| 7D | +8.3% | +3.5% | +4.8% | +7.0% |
| 30D | +18.1% | +13.7% | +4.4% | +12.8% |
| 3M | +7.8% | +33.9% | -26.1% | -5.3% |
| 6M | +136.6% | +80.9% | +55.6% | +75.1% |
| YTD | +172.5% | +52.6% | +119.9% | +123.7% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | +21.2% | +123.0% | +133.7% |
| All | +1,040.6% | -4.1% | +1,044.7% | +977.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HPQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HPQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HPQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HPQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling