+1,022.8%
NBIS vs HLT
+29.2%
+993.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HLT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | 0.0% | -1.5% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.6% | +0.8% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -5.0% | -8.3% | -10.2% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -10.4% | +11.4% | +9.7% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +3.2% | +97.3% | +89.8% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +6.7% | +161.5% | +144.3% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +10.3% | +141.5% | +118.1% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +29.2% | +993.5% | +684.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HLT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HLT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HLT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HLT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling