+1,119.4%
NBIS vs HIMS
+26.9%
+1,092.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HIMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | +1.7% | +6.1% | +7.2% |
| 7D | +22.2% | -0.9% | +23.2% | +22.6% |
| 30D | +29.7% | -10.8% | +40.6% | +33.1% |
| 3M | +11.9% | +3.7% | +8.2% | +9.1% |
| 6M | +173.0% | +79.0% | +94.0% | +114.0% |
| YTD | +191.4% | -13.2% | +204.6% | +188.8% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | -43.3% | +324.0% | +323.9% |
| All | +1,119.4% | +26.9% | +1,092.5% | +737.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HIMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HIMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HIMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HIMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling