+1,119.4%
NBIS vs GRMN
+69.8%
+1,049.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | -0.5% | +8.2% | +7.9% |
| 7D | +22.2% | +0.2% | +22.0% | +22.1% |
| 30D | +29.7% | -11.3% | +41.1% | +35.3% |
| 3M | +11.9% | +17.7% | -5.8% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +173.0% | +14.2% | +158.8% | +155.0% |
| YTD | +191.4% | +37.0% | +154.3% | +147.7% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | +17.0% | +263.7% | +244.9% |
| All | +1,119.4% | +69.8% | +1,049.6% | +953.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling