+1,022.8%
NBIS vs FTNT
+88.8%
+933.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | FTNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.8% | +0.2% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -0.1% | -0.7% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -3.0% | -10.4% | -12.7% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +7.6% | -6.6% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +87.0% | +13.5% | +46.7% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +96.5% | +71.7% | +89.6% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +92.9% | +58.8% | +80.6% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +88.8% | +933.9% | +785.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FTNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FTNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FTNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FTNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling