+1,022.8%
NBIS vs FLNC
-52.7%
+1,075.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +2.5% | -4.0% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -4.1% | +3.2% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -24.8% | +11.4% | -5.9% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -59.1% | +60.1% | +29.4% |
| 6M | +100.5% | -42.0% | +142.5% | +125.4% |
| YTD | +168.3% | -49.8% | +218.1% | +209.7% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +43.1% | +108.7% | +128.8% |
| All | +1,022.8% | -52.7% | +1,075.5% | +912.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling