+1,119.4%
NBIS vs FITB
+29.5%
+1,089.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | -0.7% | +8.4% | +8.1% |
| 7D | +22.2% | +2.8% | +19.4% | +20.4% |
| 30D | +29.7% | -4.5% | +34.3% | +33.3% |
| 3M | +11.9% | +5.7% | +6.2% | +7.8% |
| 6M | +173.0% | +17.1% | +155.9% | +143.3% |
| YTD | +191.4% | +18.3% | +173.0% | +155.2% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | +23.9% | +256.8% | +220.9% |
| All | +1,119.4% | +29.5% | +1,089.9% | +738.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling