+1,101.8%
NBIS vs FHN
+47.7%
+1,054.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FHN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.4% | -1.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +17.8% | 0.0% | +17.7% | +17.7% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -2.6% | +33.1% | +33.9% |
| 3M | +9.2% | 0.0% | +9.2% | +8.9% |
| 6M | +153.2% | +9.2% | +143.9% | +133.0% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +4.3% | +182.8% | +174.6% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +10.8% | +140.3% | +126.1% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +47.7% | +1,054.1% | +831.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FHN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FHN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FHN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FHN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling