+1,031.9%
NBIS vs FGI
+56.0%
+976.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FGI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +7.5% | -0.1% | +7.6% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +0.5% | +7.7% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +65.4% | -62.0% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +23.5% | -36.3% | -11.7% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +60.5% | +71.0% | +139.0% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +30.0% | +140.5% | +177.9% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +82.1% | +166.7% | +276.2% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +56.0% | +976.0% | +1,192.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FGI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FGI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FGI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FGI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling