+1,031.9%
NBIS vs FDS
-33.9%
+1,065.8%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -3.5% | +11.0% | +6.3% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -1.9% | +10.1% | +7.6% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +9.0% | -5.6% | +6.8% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +18.9% | -31.7% | -5.6% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +35.1% | +96.4% | +154.2% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +5.5% | +165.0% | +197.5% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | -16.8% | +265.6% | +304.4% |
| All | +1,031.9% | -33.9% | +1,065.8% | +1,223.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling