+607.2%
NBIS vs EPAM
-21.8%
+629.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | -1.6% | +10.8% | +9.3% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +9.1% | -9.0% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -36.0% | +38.5% | -74.5% | -38.8% |
| 3M | -24.7% | +61.0% | -85.7% | -30.8% |
| 6M | -20.1% | +58.0% | -78.1% | -26.5% |
| YTD | +69.0% | -23.5% | +92.4% | +116.5% |
| 1Y | +27.1% | -10.5% | +37.7% | +46.3% |
| All | +607.2% | -21.8% | +629.1% | +716.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling