+1,022.8%
NBIS vs EOSE
+23.4%
+999.3%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.0% | -0.6% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +1.8% | -2.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -6.8% | -6.5% | -12.0% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -36.3% | +37.3% | +17.1% |
| 6M | +100.5% | -38.8% | +139.3% | +125.0% |
| YTD | +168.3% | -65.5% | +233.8% | +249.8% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | -45.3% | +197.1% | +168.2% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +23.4% | +999.3% | +678.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling