+1,119.4%
NBIS vs ENTG
+38.7%
+1,080.7%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | +1.7% | +6.0% | +6.5% |
| 7D | +22.2% | +8.9% | +13.3% | +15.1% |
| 30D | +29.7% | -7.2% | +37.0% | +38.4% |
| 3M | +11.9% | +6.4% | +5.5% | +8.8% |
| 6M | +173.0% | +25.7% | +147.3% | +132.8% |
| YTD | +191.4% | +67.9% | +123.5% | +103.9% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | +72.4% | +208.3% | +156.3% |
| All | +1,119.4% | +38.7% | +1,080.7% | +998.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling