+1,119.4%
NBIS vs ENPH
-57.3%
+1,176.7%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | +6.8% | +1.0% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +22.2% | +9.3% | +13.0% | +19.6% |
| 30D | +29.7% | -7.3% | +37.0% | +31.8% |
| 3M | +11.9% | -31.7% | +43.6% | +21.5% |
| 6M | +173.0% | -3.5% | +176.5% | +173.6% |
| YTD | +191.4% | +21.2% | +170.2% | +174.4% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | +0.1% | +280.7% | +271.5% |
| All | +1,119.4% | -57.3% | +1,176.7% | +1,255.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling