+1,031.9%
NBIS vs EMR
+42.8%
+989.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EMR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +1.7% | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -1.5% | +9.7% | +10.3% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -5.6% | +9.0% | +10.9% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +7.9% | -20.8% | -18.8% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +6.0% | +125.5% | +118.1% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +16.4% | +154.0% | +128.6% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +16.6% | +232.2% | +191.9% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +42.8% | +989.1% | +722.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling