+1,040.6%
NBIS vs DUOL
-49.3%
+1,089.8%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DUOL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | +4.3% | -9.3% | -6.4% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -8.6% | +16.9% | +11.0% |
| 30D | +18.1% | +7.2% | +10.9% | +13.2% |
| 3M | +7.8% | +19.1% | -11.3% | -4.2% |
| 6M | +136.6% | +52.5% | +84.0% | +83.2% |
| YTD | +172.5% | -17.3% | +189.8% | +181.2% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | -49.2% | +193.5% | +213.5% |
| All | +1,040.6% | -49.3% | +1,089.8% | +1,363.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DUOL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DUOL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DUOL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DUOL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling