+1,031.9%
NBIS vs DFNS
-96.2%
+1,128.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DFNS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +0.6% | +6.9% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -16.0% | +24.2% | +8.1% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -77.7% | +81.1% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -77.2% | +64.4% | -11.4% |
| 6M | +131.5% | -95.2% | +226.7% | +131.0% |
| YTD | +170.5% | -98.0% | +268.4% | +166.7% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | -98.3% | +347.0% | +244.6% |
| All | +1,031.9% | -96.2% | +1,128.1% | +1,265.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DFNS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DFNS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DFNS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DFNS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling