+607.6%
NBIS vs DECK
-44.8%
+652.4%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | +6.0% | -12.6% | -7.8% |
| 7D | -22.4% | +10.4% | -32.8% | -24.0% |
| 30D | -39.1% | +11.1% | -50.2% | -40.5% |
| 3M | -37.3% | -10.8% | -26.5% | -36.0% |
| 6M | -19.8% | -8.7% | -11.0% | -20.4% |
| YTD | +69.1% | -14.0% | +83.1% | +68.4% |
| 1Y | +28.0% | +12.0% | +16.0% | +12.8% |
| All | +607.6% | -44.8% | +652.4% | +585.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling