+1,022.8%
NBIS vs BRKR
-13.2%
+1,036.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BRKR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.2% | -1.3% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -8.7% | +7.9% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -9.9% | -3.5% | -10.6% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -3.1% | +4.1% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +45.5% | +55.0% | +71.3% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +13.7% | +154.6% | +149.4% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +67.4% | +84.3% | +99.1% |
| All | +1,022.8% | -13.2% | +1,036.0% | +978.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BRKR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BRKR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BRKR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BRKR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling