+1,022.8%
NBIS vs BLK
+12.0%
+1,010.8%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BLK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +1.6% | -3.2% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -3.3% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -6.5% | -6.8% | -8.4% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +6.7% | -5.7% | -5.4% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +14.7% | +85.8% | +72.4% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +2.5% | +165.7% | +158.8% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | -2.8% | +154.5% | +155.8% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +12.0% | +1,010.8% | +793.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling