+1,119.4%
NBIS vs BLDR
-67.8%
+1,187.2%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | -4.9% | +12.6% | +8.4% |
| 7D | +22.2% | -0.3% | +22.6% | +22.2% |
| 30D | +29.7% | -16.2% | +46.0% | +32.6% |
| 3M | +11.9% | -14.4% | +26.3% | +13.8% |
| 6M | +173.0% | -32.8% | +205.8% | +187.9% |
| YTD | +191.4% | -39.2% | +230.5% | +211.8% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | -57.7% | +338.4% | +332.8% |
| All | +1,119.4% | -67.8% | +1,187.2% | +1,140.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling