+1,101.8%
NBIS vs APTV
-38.6%
+1,140.3%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.7% | +1.2% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -1.2% | +18.9% | +18.2% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -10.6% | +41.2% | +37.6% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -35.0% | +44.2% | +36.3% |
| 6M | +153.2% | -38.9% | +192.1% | +224.8% |
| YTD | +187.1% | -41.5% | +228.6% | +279.5% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | -45.8% | +196.9% | +250.5% |
| All | +1,101.8% | -38.6% | +1,140.3% | +1,241.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling