+1,031.9%
NBIS vs APA
+82.9%
+949.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | APA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -3.2% | +10.7% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +0.5% | +7.7% | +8.0% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +23.4% | -20.0% | -1.5% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +12.7% | -25.5% | -15.6% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +39.4% | +92.1% | +104.5% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +79.0% | +91.5% | +116.2% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +88.8% | +159.9% | +167.2% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +82.9% | +949.0% | +627.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling