+1,031.9%
NBIS vs AMDL
+269.1%
+762.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMDL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | +9.2% | -1.7% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +8.2% | +4.5% | +3.7% | +6.5% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -4.4% | +7.8% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -30.5% | +17.7% | -3.4% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +300.9% | -169.4% | +22.3% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +219.9% | -49.5% | +48.5% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +374.7% | -125.9% | +44.4% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +269.1% | +762.9% | +513.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMDL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMDL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMDL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMDL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling