+1,101.8%
NBIS vs AEM
+138.2%
+963.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AEM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.4% | -1.8% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +17.8% | +3.0% | +14.8% | +16.5% |
| 30D | +30.5% | +12.5% | +18.1% | +25.1% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +26.9% | -17.8% | -0.3% |
| 6M | +153.2% | -9.4% | +162.6% | +151.0% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +20.3% | +166.9% | +168.7% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +33.8% | +117.3% | +136.2% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +138.2% | +963.6% | +776.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AEM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AEM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AEM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AEM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling